An analysis of common agricultural policy

The reform fosters the use of Sentinel data with the objective of enabling greater transparency and comparability of CAP results in different Member States. In this paper, we investigate the analysis of a time series approach using Sentinel-2 images and the suitability of the BFAST Breaks for Additive Season and Trend Monitor method to detect changes that correspond to land use anomaly observations in the assessment of agricultural parcel management activities. We focus on identifying certain signs of ineligible inconsistent use in permanent meadows and crop fields in one growing season, and in particular those that can be associated with time-defined greenness vegetation vigor. Depending on the requirements of the BFAST Monitor method and currently time-limited Sentinel-2 dataset for the reliable anomaly study, we introduce customized procedures to support and verify the BFAST Monitor anomaly detection results using the analysis of NDVI Normalized Difference Vegetation Index object-based temporal profiles and time-series standard deviation output, where geographical objects of interest are parcels of particular land use.

An analysis of common agricultural policy

The proponents of this view believe that agriculture can only contribute to the economy through a concentrated production structure such as the one currently existing. Accordingly, they believe that smaller and medium-scale agriculture, based upon diversified production, family labour and lower technologies, has little to offer in terms of aggregate production and incomes from farming.

Yet the current dominance of the modern large-scale and technically successful farming model must be seen in the context of a century of policy measures which seriously distorted agricultural development in South Africa.

This dominant model has some undeniable advantages, but in a country with high unemployment and food insecurity, it has serious limitations. In future, both efficiency and equity will call for a much greater diversity of farm sizes and technology in the sector, with large-scale commercial farming coexisting with small and medium-scale production.

The origins of policy distortions In the latter part of the nineteenth century, African family farming successfully responded to the increased demand for agricultural products from the new mining towns and the major towns of the English colony of Natal.

African owner-operated or tenant farming proved to be at least as efficient as large-scale settler farming based on hired labour. African farmers adopted new agricultural technologies, entered new industries and competed successfully.

In fact, white farmers argued that because of labour shortages, they could not compete with their African counterparts who had lower costs. Competition from black transporters of agricultural produce was also deemed unfair by white transporters.

Critical to this African success was the unwillingness of the Government to intervene in markets, and the implicit support for African farming from land companies and big landowners who earned rents from African tenant farmers. The aim was to create surplus labour for the mines and the white agricultural sector.

At a stroke, it also eliminated competition from black farmers. At about this time, white farmers also started receiving substantial support in the form of subsidies, grants and other aid for fencing, dams, houses, veterinary and horticultural advice, as well as subsidised rail rates, special credit facilities and tax relief.

The Masters and Servants Acts of anddesigned to increase the supply of cheap labour, further worsened the plight of farm workers who were prohibited from breaking contracts or changing employers.

Over the following half a century, the support system for white farmers was steadily strengthened. Over 80 Acts of Parliament were passed rendering assistance to the commercial farming sector, particularly in marketing.

In the s the Agricultural Credit Board ACB was established to give loans to farmers who were no longer found adequately creditworthy by commercial institutions.

Infrastructure was built, strong support services were established and assistance was provided through the Land Bank for the acquisition of land for farming by whites. The white commercial agricultural sector responded positively, with substantial output increases. Farmers were protected from foreign competition, subsidies continued, and producer prices, which were largely controlled, were frequently above world-market levels.

The costs of distortions Although these policies encouraged technical advance and increased production, they also had high social, economic and environmental costs.

Foremost among these was high capital-intensive production in the presence of widespread unemployment. Favourable tax treatment of capital equipment, combined with negative real interest rates, encouraged overmechanisation and the shedding of labour.

Further, it led to expansion into environmentally fragile areas. Guaranteed maize prices led to large stretches of marginal land in South Africa being planted to the crop, leading to costly programmes in the s to induce farmers to switch from maize to other products.

Until aboutthe total number of farm employees in South Africa steadily increased, but the impact of favourable credit and tax policies encouraged the substitution of labour by capital.

Meanwhile, in the homelands, pressure on arable and grazing land continued to increase. The system of supports and subsidies of the period became increasingly burdensome to a Government already constrained by international financial sanctions and disinvestment.

A qualitative analysis of Common Agricultural Policy and social demands on agriculture.

From the s, there was an erosion in direct Government support to agriculture, which accelerated in the s with the removal of the barriers between black and white farmers and the creation of a less dependent and more market-driven agricultural sector. Policy reforms A great deal has already been accomplished over the past few years in eliminating the inefficiencies that have characterised large parts of the sector, in particular the inequality and insecurity in landownership and the distortions in price and other signals to the sector.

Land As a result of decades of dispossession and racist land laws, land distribution in South Africa is among the most highly skewed in the world, with large capital-intensive farms dominating much of the rural areas. In the face of this, the Government has introduced a market-based land redistribution programme, which provides grants and technical assistance to the landless poor.

Several mechanisms have been used to date to enable prospective purchasers to acquire land - from direct purchase to a variety of equity schemes.

An analysis of common agricultural policy

The Government has also introduced a programme of tenure reform which aims to bring all people occupying land under a validated system of landholding. The Government has also initiated a programme of restitution of land, which involves returning or otherwise compensating victims of land lost since June because of racially discriminatory laws.

Legislation was also recently approved to protect vulnerable occupiers of land which the occupiers do not not ownincluding farm workers. The Extension of Security of Tenure Act addresses the relationship between occupiers and owners, as well as the circumstances under which evictions are permissible, and the procedures to be followed.The Role of Germany in the Common Agricultural Policy Introduction At the time of its birth, the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) was supposed to be a major engine of European market integration.2 There was a ture for the of the subsequent analysis.

To understand policy formation in the EU, as in any other country. The European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) post timeframe reform will reshape the agriculture land use control procedures from a selected risk fields-based approach into an all-inclusive one.

The reform fosters the use of Sentinel data with the objective of enabling greater transparency and comparability of CAP results in different Member States. of Common Agricultural Policy on farmers. In general one of the most important drivers in the decision process to convert the agricultural production from a conventional model towards an organic one are the technical efficiency, the.

USDA ERS - Common Agricultural Policy

Nov 15,  · Agriculture is the only sector of the European Union (EU) where there is a common policy. Agricultural policy is proposed by a supranational authority—the European Commission, agreed to or amended by agricultural ministers of EU member nations, and reviewed by the European Parliament.

Historically, the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has played a critical role in connecting very. It is also true that agriculture contributes % of GDP, but we spend less than 1% of total public expenditure on the Common Agricultural Policy.

Plus, not only for food, but also for land management in the 47% of the European territory. A common-size analysis is employed with every financial statement item divided by sales in each corresponding year and the common-size results are also reported in Tables 1 and 2.

Q&A: Reform of EU farm policy - BBC News