What are some of the root causes of the conflict between Lovas and Bennett? Both Lovas and Bennett have developed a design but cannot agree to validity of each other design. The collaboration for the design of the image system is nonexistent. It is adversely affecting the group as a whole.
How to Write a Summary of an Article? The project has a strict schedule to meet in regards to the requirements or else penalties will be placed on the company if the deadlines are not met. There appears to be conflicts of intra-group dynamics within the team as well as individual cooperation differences.
The differences of opinion between Lovas and Bennett have become hostile and have alienated others within the group. The bitter relationship is threatening the entire project and has placed tension on Gary Pinto, who is running out of time and options in deciding the best application for the system.
Pinto is aware of the dynamics surrounding the two main protagonists. The satera team at imatron system has been very conscientious when dealing with the conflicts and is very accommodating to the entire group as they appear to be negatively affected by the conflict presented by the two individuals.
There seems to be gossip and behind the scenes communication that is relating to the project. This appears to be causing more complications to the process. It also seems that the team is encountering social loafing because no one wants to get involved in the conflict between the two engineers.
The lack of communication between the two leads, and their inability to work together, is resulting in unaccomplished tasks.
Problem Analysis There are several underlying problems within this team. Bennett and Lovas are both unwilling to compromise and collaborate their designs which is holding up the entire project.
The two engineers are very competitive because they both feel they are more knowledgeable than the other. Because of this conflict, team members avoid speaking up during meetings. They are being asked for input by Pinto and they seem to be accommodating rather than giving their perspectives.
During the meetings there are no open-ended discussions or effective problem solving. There appears to be divergent thinking happening but no compromise is being obtained.
The biggest issue is the lack of trust within the team. Bennett and Lovas are unable to form an effective partnership due to this issue. The lack of trust could also lead the group to losing faith in Pinto because he has been struggling to fix this situation between Bennett and Lovas.
With the lack of trust, it is more than likely that the perception of the abilities of the all three senior members is being questioned. All three of these problems directly correlate with each other. The correlation can be viewed in reverse.
This distrust in the projects leader causes the lack of communication between members because honest opinions could potentially lead to more conflict. The main root of the three problems is that the two engineers have two very different ways of thinking.
It is difficult to see how the team could benefit from the different perspectives because these two members must realize the benefits first.
Having the two engineers create two alternative designs was the easy, yet ineffective way to deal with this issue. Creating two alternate prototypes forced a situation where one of the two engineers would be made to feel inferior to the other.
The actual outcome, Lovas creating the superior model, was predictable, and the worst possible because Bennett is less graceful in admitting defeat and will take a larger emotional toll.
If Pinto would have been stronger initially and forced the two designers to create one model this situation would not have arisen. This situation does have a beneficial aspect in that an almost usable model has been created, and with the proper leadership here on out the team could really make something amazing.
Action Plan Both Lovas and Bennett have their unique qualities that they bring to the table that differentiate them from one another. Gary Pinto has been described in the case as being known for his honesty and respect.
However, Pinto is facing a tough decision of whether the honeycomb structure is feasible to meet the criteria for Satera. Unfortunately, it was deemed too heavy and would need further expertise.
Pinto can only accomplish this through sufficient help of his team. Gary Pinto can use both Ira Lovas and David Bennett to their full potentials by having them work together to complete a well-rounded support structure for the imaging system.Satera Team at Imatron Systems, Inc.
(A) Increasing conflict has exploded inside the Satera product team, caused by the conflicting cognitive styles of these two senior mechanical engineers.
Satera Team at Imatron Systems Inc. (A) Case Solution, The escalating conflict erupted in the product development team Satera conflict resulting cognitive styles of the two high-level mechanical engineers. The. Imatron Case Analysis By Team Synergy Problem Identification The Remote Imaging Division (RID) of Imatron is responsible for the development of a satellite camera to monitor environmental threats for the U.
S. government. Home >> Harvard Case Study Analysis Solutions >> Satera Team at Imatron Systems Inc. (B) ← Previous Post Next Post → Satera Team at Imatron Systems Inc. (B) Harvard Case Solution & Analysis. Essays - largest database of quality sample essays and research papers on The Satera Team At Imatron System.
Satera Team at Imatron Systems Inc. (A) Case Solution,Satera Team at Imatron Systems Inc. (A) Case Analysis, Satera Team at Imatron Systems Inc. (A) Case Study Solution, Escalation of the conflict broke out in the product development team Satera, as a result of conflicting cognitive styles of the two chief engineers.